In partnership with
Hey everyone,
While everyone's waiting for GPT-5 and Claude Opus, something interesting is happening right under our noses.
Small AI models are doing the actual work and doing it better. They're 10-30 times cheaper to run. They cut infrastructure costs by 75%. And companies are quietly choosing them instead of the big names.
AT&T already sees it: "Fine-tuned small models will dominate enterprise AI" in 2026. You know that old rule about picking two out of three, good, cheap, or fast? Small models break that rule. You get all three.
📊 The Small Model Advantage
The Performance Nobody Expected
Here's what shocked researchers. In requirements classification tasks, small models perform almost identically to giants.
Llama-3-8B scored F1 scores of 0.76, 0.78, and 0.88 across three benchmarks. Claude-4, which is 100 to 300 times larger, scored 0.81, 0.80, and 0.89. The difference? 2% average F1 score. Not statistically significant.
Read that again. A model you can run on your laptop performs within 2% of a model that costs thousands to deploy.
In some metrics, small models actually won. Higher recall. Better precision on specific tasks. The catch? They need to be fine-tuned for the vertical they're serving.
The Cost Math That Changes Everything
Running GPT-4 level models costs real money. Between $3 and $15 per million output tokens depending on the provider. For a high-volume app, that adds up to thousands monthly.
Small models run way cheaper. Some use cases drop from $3,000 per month to $127 per month just by switching to a fine-tuned 7B model.
Real Cost Comparison
Enterprise deploying a customer service bot processing millions of tokens monthly:
- Large LLM (GPT-4 class): $3,000-$5,000/month
- Fine-tuned 7B model: $127-$400/month
Same task. 10x to 30x cost difference.
Latency tells a similar story. Enterprise models like Mistral 7B deliver 142ms response times when deployed locally. Even smaller 1B to 2B models hit under 100ms. Cloud-based LLMs sit at 200 to 500ms because of network overhead.
Where Small Models Actually Win
India is leading this shift. Small models excel with linguistic diversity and limited infrastructure. When fine-tuned for regional languages or specific domains, they outperform generalists.
The pattern holds everywhere. Vertical AI beats horizontal AI when the task is specific.
Healthcare diagnostics. Legal document analysis. Supply chain optimization. Financial compliance. Code generation for specific frameworks.
These aren't chatbot tasks. They're production systems running real business operations. And small, fine-tuned models are winning because they're:
Faster to train
Cheaper to serve
Deployable on device or private servers
Better at domain-specific tasks
You Cut AI Costs. Now Cut CRM Costs.
You're fine-tuning 7B models instead of paying for GPT-5. Apply the same thinking to your CRM. Attio gives you enterprise power without enterprise pricing. Clean data, fast workflows, zero bloat.
→ Try Attio here ⤵
Introducing the first AI-native CRM
Connect your email, and you’ll instantly get a CRM with enriched customer insights and a platform that grows with your business.
With AI at the core, Attio lets you:
Prospect and route leads with research agents
Get real-time insights during customer calls
Build powerful automations for your complex workflows
Join industry leaders like Granola, Taskrabbit, Flatfile and more.
The Models Worth Watching
Not all small models are created equal. Here's what's actually shipping in 2026:
For mobile and edge devices:
TinyLlama (1.1B): Runs on phones with sub-5 second responses
Phi-3.5 Mini (3.8B): 128K context window, multilingual, reasoning-focused
For enterprise deployment:
Llama 3.1 8B: 128K context, strong at coding, handles complex reasoning
Mistral 7B: 32K context, enterprise workflows, production-ready
Qwen 2.5 7B: Multimodal capabilities, strong price-performance ratio
For specialized tasks:
Gemma2 (9B): Local deployment, built for real-time apps
GLM-4 (9B): Code generation, creative tasks, affordable pricing
All of these run on consumer hardware. Most need between 4 and 10GB of RAM. Deploy them locally and you own the infrastructure.
The Startup Opportunity
Funding is flowing into vertical AI. Not generic GPT wrappers. Domain-specific tools that solve one problem perfectly.
The vertical AI pattern is clear. Investors want specialization over generalization. They want models trained on focused data for specific industries.
Gartner predicts AI infrastructure spending will jump from $18.3B to $37.5B in 2026. But enterprises are consolidating vendors. They're choosing fewer, better-fit solutions over generic platforms.
That's the opening. Build for one vertical. Fine-tune a 7B model. Deploy it locally. Charge for accuracy, speed, and privacy.
Think smaller:
Diagnostic AI for radiologists
Compliance checker for accountants
Code reviewer for Ruby developers
Contract analyzer for real estate agents
Supply chain optimizer for manufacturers
Pick one problem. Own one vertical. That's how independent builders compete with billion-dollar labs.
Stay sharp,
Better Every Day
📬 Building a vertical AI tool? Hit reply. I'm tracking what's actually working in production.
Pay for Results, Stop Paying for Traffic
Your problem isn’t traffic, it’s paying for useless clicks that never convert.
Levanta helps Amazon sellers shift from ad spend to performance based affiliate marketing so you only pay when a sale happens.
