In partnership with
The Problem Was Never the Idea
Most people treat business ideas like lottery tickets. Pick one that feels right, go all in, and hope the market agrees.
It rarely does.
The problem is not effort. Most founders and creators work hard. The real issue is that they skip the one thing that separates a good idea from a good-looking idea: structured evaluation.
Before you build a product, launch a website/app or spend three months on a service nobody asked for, your idea needs to pass five simple checkpoints. Not a lengthy business plan. Not expensive market research. Just five honest questions that tell you whether the ground you are standing on is actually solid.
That is exactly what this issue is about. And there is a free tool waiting for you further down.
Investor-ready updates, by voice
High-stakes communications need precision. Wispr Flow turns speech into polished, publishable writing you can paste into investor updates, earnings notes, board recaps, and executive summaries. Speak constraints, numbers, and context and Flow will remove filler, fix punctuation, format lists, and preserve tone so your messages are clear and confident. Use saved templates for recurring financial formats and create consistent reports with less editing. Works across Mac, Windows, and iPhone. Try Wispr Flow for finance.
📊 Why Most Idea Evaluation Is Broken
The typical process goes something like this: you think of an idea, you Google it once, you see some results and assume that means there's demand. Or worse, you see no results and assume that means there's a gap. Neither conclusion is correct on its own.
What founders and creators consistently underestimate is that a good business idea needs to pass multiple checkpoints simultaneously. Search demand without a monetization path is just traffic. A clean monetization path with zero demand is just theory. Strong demand in a market dominated by entrenched competitors with massive marketing budgets is a war you are not equipped to fight on day one.
Research from Investopedia and startup founders repeatedly points to the same root cause of early failure: skipping structured validation. Not skipping work, most people work very hard. Skipping the right questions in the right order.
The five questions every viable idea must answer:
- Search Demand: Are real people actively looking for a solution to this problem?
- Competition Level: Is the market open enough for a newcomer to get traction?
- Monetization Path: Is there a clear, realistic way to make money from this?
- Time to First Dollar: How long before this idea generates any revenue at all?
- Automation Potential: Can the core delivery be systematized, or does every dollar require your manual time?
Answer all five, assign scores, and the picture becomes very clear, very fast.
The Question Nobody Asks: How Long Until Dollar One?
Every founder has a theory about how they will eventually make money. Very few have a theory about when.
Time to first dollar is one of the most underrated validation criteria. A niche might score well on demand and have reasonable competition, but if the monetization structure means you will not realistically earn anything for twelve months, that changes the entire calculus. You burn energy, lose momentum and often abandon the idea before it had a real chance.
The businesses that survive the early period are usually the ones where the founder had a realistic expectation of the timeline. Not optimism, realism. A service-based model can generate revenue in weeks. A SaaS product built from scratch might take six months to get to a paying user. It’s not a bad model, but you need to understand them before you start not while you are already in the middle of them.
Automation Potential Changes Everything
There is a critical difference between a business and a job you gave yourself.
A business where every transaction, every delivery, and every customer interaction requires your direct involvement has a hard ceiling. Your revenue is capped by your available hours. Every vacation is lost income. Every sick day is a missed opportunity.
Automation potential as a validation criterion asks a simple question: which parts of this can run without me? Tbh it’s not about removing the human element entirely. It’s about identifying whether the core value delivery can be systematized. A digital product sells while you sleep. A productized service with templated delivery takes far less time per client than a fully custom engagement.
When you score an idea for automation potential, you are essentially scoring for scalability. And scalability is what separates a side project from a business.
Equipment policies break when you hire globally
Deel’s latest policy template on IT Equipment Policies can help HR teams stay organized when handling requests across time zones (and even languages). This free template gives you:
Clear provisioning rules across all countries
Security protocols that prevent compliance gaps
Return processes that actually work remotely
This free equipment provisioning policy will enable you to adjust to any state or country you hire from instead of producing a new policy every time. That means less complexity and more time for greater priorities.
🎁 Free Tool: The Business Idea Validator (Google Sheet)
I built a Google Sheet that walks you through this scoring process for any niche you want to evaluate. You input your idea, answer five structured questions, and get a total score that tells you whether to move forward, refine, or drop it entirely.
It is not a passive read. It is something you actively fill out for each idea you are considering, and the results tend to be clarifying in a way that gut feeling never is.
👉 Access the Business Idea Validator here (free)
Make a copy to your own Google Drive and start scoring your ideas today.
How to Use the Sheet Without Fooling Yourself
The tool only works if you are honest with the inputs.
The most common mistake is confirmation bias: you already like an idea, so you score it generously across every dimension. Search demand is "high" because you found one Reddit thread. Competition is "low" because you did not look hard enough. The sheet has no way to protect you from this if you decide to game it.
The right approach is to score an idea twice: once with your instincts, then again after doing real research. Check keyword volumes on Google Trends or a free tool like Ubersuggest. Look at the actual businesses ranking in your niche and estimate their monthly traffic. Try to find a real person who has already paid money for something in this space. If you can find proof of payment in the wild, that is stronger evidence than any score you assign.
Use the second score as your real number. The gap between your first and second score is exactly where your assumptions were hiding.
🔗 Useful Resources to Pair With This Framework
- Google Trends: Free search demand signal, especially useful for niche seasonality checks
- Failory's Startup Validation Guide: Honest breakdown of pre-sales as a validation method
- First Round Review: How experienced founders actually test ideas before building
- Our Newsletter: More tools, frameworks, and resources like this, every week
The Real Cost of Skipping This Step
Skipping validation is not free. It has a very specific cost: weeks or months of effort pointed at the wrong target.
The founders who move fastest are not the ones who start immediately. They are the ones who validate quickly and start with confidence. That distinction matters because confidence from evidence produces follow-through, while confidence from assumption tends to collapse the moment the first obstacle appears.
The scoring framework in that Google Sheet will not tell you whether your execution will be good. It will not tell you whether you have what it takes to build something. But it will tell you whether the ground you are standing on is solid before you start construction.
That is worth more than most people give it credit for.
Run your current idea through the validator today. You might confirm what you already believed, which is useful. Or you might find one weak dimension that, if improved, makes the whole concept substantially stronger. Either outcome is a better starting point than a blank page and a feeling.
If you found this useful, share it with someone sitting on an idea they have not acted on yet.
Here’s how I use Attio to run my day.
Attio is the AI CRM with conversational AI built directly into your workspace. Every morning, Ask Attio handles my prep:
Surfaces insights from calls and conversations across my entire CRM
Update records and create tasks without manual entry
Answers questions about deals, accounts, and customer signals that used to take hours to find
All in seconds. No searching, no switching tabs, no manual updates.
Ready to scale faster?
Stay sharp,
Better Every Day
📬 Building something unique? Hit reply. I'm tracking tools and approaches for a future breakdown.
